| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
dustin Lux Admin


Joined: 15 May 2003 Posts: 9124 Location: Vancouver
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2010 12:29 pm Post subject: October 9th-10th TeamPlay Tournament |
|
|
Saturday 9th - Sunday 10th, Lux TeamPlay Tournament
Time: all weekend
This tournament will consist of 1 or more rooms playing Team games. If you've never played a Team Lux game, look at the TeamPlay page in the wiki.
Scoring is displayed on the Team results page:
http://sillysoft.net/lux/rankings/team/
Each team needs to play at least 50 games minimum to get a score, which will be the (points/games) average.
You will be assigned to a team when you show up, if you don't have one already. Your team will show beside your name when you do the /u command. Teams are matched up with similar colors in games.
Sometimes a Reaper team will get put in the game. In such a case, it's not bots-first. It's every team for themselves!
Good luck!
Last edited by Nimrod7 on Mon Oct 11, 2010 6:24 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Enokrad Dark Spawn

Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 3295 Location: New York
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Half way on Saturday and we are already at the half point of minimum games.
How about we raise it this year to 100? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SmotPoker Lux Addict

Joined: 16 Mar 2008 Posts: 1100 Location: Pot farm
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2010 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd vote yes, if it's open for voting  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Enzo1997 Lux Vacationer

Joined: 25 May 2009 Posts: 1598 Location: The edge of sanity
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2010 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| possibly, but I would say 80 games. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hanzal69 Lux Newbie
Joined: 28 May 2007 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 6:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| and still no LCS in the rank page... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SmotPoker Lux Addict

Joined: 16 Mar 2008 Posts: 1100 Location: Pot farm
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Enzo1997 Lux Vacationer

Joined: 25 May 2009 Posts: 1598 Location: The edge of sanity
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| LCS well to put it lightly tripped on it's way out of the starting gate. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
paranoiarodeo Lux Moderator


Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 8179 Location: Perched Upon the Eternal Throne of Lobotomia
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just as a footnote ...
In the future I believe points awarded for bots games need to be diminished somewhat ...
I'd rather see teams earn their place by besting one another ...
∞ paranoiarodeo shrugs ∞ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Darth Rellek Sith Lord

Joined: 22 Mar 2005 Posts: 1334
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| paranoiarodeo wrote: | Just as a footnote ...
In the future I believe points awarded for bots games need to be diminished somewhat ...
I'd rather see teams earn their place by besting one another ...
∞ paranoiarodeo shrugs ∞ |
so those teams that played 30+ bot games got the same points as a fullhose????
That doesnt seem right. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
paranoiarodeo Lux Moderator


Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 8179 Location: Perched Upon the Eternal Throne of Lobotomia
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Darth Rellek wrote: | | That doesnt seem right. |
Didn't seem right last year or the year before that or ...
∞ paranoiarodeo should permanently retire as player and become Lux's official stats rankings and tourney guy ∞ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
calmdowndonk Lux Newbie
Joined: 30 Sep 2010 Posts: 1 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I thought this toruney was meant to be played against humans, team RW are playing the system, they play 3 vs 3 bots all the time.
does not look so fair :/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Darth Rellek Sith Lord

Joined: 22 Mar 2005 Posts: 1334
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
omg, we, SED just play a 3 vs 3bots, and got 7 points for the win!!!
That just seems unfair to people that actually play.
so if we played 30 games with bots and won we'd get 210 points???
Last edited by Darth Rellek on Sun Oct 10, 2010 1:52 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Capicola Gorgeous Man

Joined: 13 Aug 2010 Posts: 463 Location: Cleveland Heights
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gooooooo darth! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Enzo1997 Lux Vacationer

Joined: 25 May 2009 Posts: 1598 Location: The edge of sanity
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| of course you say nothing when SED does the same 7 games in a row all bots |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Darth Rellek Sith Lord

Joined: 22 Mar 2005 Posts: 1334
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Enzo1997 wrote: | | of course you say nothing when SED does the same 7 games in a row all bots |
of course we are, we are trying to catch up with the rest of you that have played so many bot,
but now that we do it, its wrong?
and we are willing to play only humans, but people arent guesting in
one team told his own team members that they wouldnt guest in to play us3 vs 3 cause they didnt want to lose their winning %
Last edited by Darth Rellek on Sun Oct 10, 2010 2:52 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
paranoiarodeo Lux Moderator


Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 8179 Location: Perched Upon the Eternal Throne of Lobotomia
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Enokrad Dark Spawn

Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 3295 Location: New York
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Like last year, something should be done about the bot games.
2 vs 2 vs 2 is fine.
3 vs 3 bot games though should not count.
there is one team in particular that has made a killing with the bots. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
paranoiarodeo Lux Moderator


Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 8179 Location: Perched Upon the Eternal Throne of Lobotomia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Enokrad Dark Spawn

Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 3295 Location: New York
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well my team and i have been using the same tactic and have jumped to second place.
only shows how flawed the 3 vs 3 bot games are |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Enzo1997 Lux Vacationer

Joined: 25 May 2009 Posts: 1598 Location: The edge of sanity
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Notice seductions 3.04? Maybe it's because of their 10 bot games, even after saying that bot games are wrong. Hmm... suspicious, hypocrytical, no couldn't be.
RW are .18 off the lead
10M are .19 off the lead
MFS are .22 off the lead
AND are .36 off the lead
We are all still in this so LET'S GO FTW! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Enokrad Dark Spawn

Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 3295 Location: New York
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 6:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
different maps would have been nice too.
nobody wants to play deux anymore.
Rome games just take up to long to finish |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Drifter Lux Moderator


Joined: 20 Nov 2005 Posts: 6633 Location: An undisclosed location... for reasons of security, and therefore... insecurity...
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| So suggest a map everyone wants to play. Classic was up for a while... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Behemoth Lux Flyweight

Joined: 29 Mar 2009 Posts: 1219
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Enokrad wrote: | different maps would have been nice too.
nobody wants to play deux anymore.
Rome games just take up to long to finish |
Few folks in Duex now.
On another topic. Be great if there was a way to get un-stuck from a team that doesn't attend. LCS was a non-event last year and non-existent this year  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Enzo1997 Lux Vacationer

Joined: 25 May 2009 Posts: 1598 Location: The edge of sanity
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fine as long as we're changing rules to certain teams advantage let's make the minimum amount of games to 125. Okay? RW played so many games, we should get some type of advantage.
Last edited by Enzo1997 on Sun Oct 10, 2010 8:07 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Enzo1997 Lux Vacationer

Joined: 25 May 2009 Posts: 1598 Location: The edge of sanity
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Anyhow why do we even have robots if games against them don't count? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Darth Rellek Sith Lord

Joined: 22 Mar 2005 Posts: 1334
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yes, you are correct, I did complain about the scoring, and was told that this is the way it has been for the past two years, and that I shouldn't complain.
So I decided to roll with it and try to take advantage of it, as other teams were doing,
And now people want to complain about that.
I dont see how anyone can play over 50% of the tourney under one scoring, then think it should be changed to another scoring half way through.
Play, have fun. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Enzo1997 Lux Vacationer

Joined: 25 May 2009 Posts: 1598 Location: The edge of sanity
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When is this tourney ending?
12:00 EST? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
paranoiarodeo Lux Moderator


Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 8179 Location: Perched Upon the Eternal Throne of Lobotomia
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Darth Rellek wrote: | | I did complain about the scoring, and was told that this is the way it has been for the past two years, and that I shouldn't complain. |
Perhaps you were told wrong ... ?
dustin's mid-tourney rule change in 2009 ... !
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Enokrad Dark Spawn

Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 3295 Location: New York
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
With the current system my team is in first place.
even so i support not counting the 3 vs 3 bot games even if though it brings my team to 3rd place.
How is this changing the rules to my teams advantage????? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Drifter Lux Moderator


Joined: 20 Nov 2005 Posts: 6633 Location: An undisclosed location... for reasons of security, and therefore... insecurity...
|
Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Be glad the 100 game minimum rule change did not take place... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|