October 9th-10th TeamPlay Tournament

Game of universal domination. New dice available free upon request.
User avatar
dustin
Lux Creator
Lux Creator
Posts: 10370
Joined: Thu May 15, 2003 2:01 am
Location: Cascadia
Contact:

October 9th-10th TeamPlay Tournament

Post by dustin » Sat Oct 09, 2010 1:29 pm

Saturday 9th - Sunday 10th, Lux TeamPlay Tournament

Time: all weekend

This tournament will consist of 1 or more rooms playing Team games. If you've never played a Team Lux game, look at the TeamPlay page in the wiki.

Scoring is displayed on the Team results page:
http://sillysoft.net/lux/rankings/team/

Each team needs to play at least 50 games minimum to get a score, which will be the (points/games) average.

You will be assigned to a team when you show up, if you don't have one already. Your team will show beside your name when you do the /u command. Teams are matched up with similar colors in games.

Sometimes a Reaper team will get put in the game. In such a case, it's not bots-first. It's every team for themselves!

Good luck!

User avatar
Enokrad
Dark Spawn
Posts: 3367
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:16 am
Location: New York
Contact:

Post by Enokrad » Sat Oct 09, 2010 5:41 pm

Half way on Saturday and we are already at the half point of minimum games.

How about we raise it this year to 100?

User avatar
SmotPoker
Lux Addict
Posts: 1231
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 3:45 pm
Location: Pot farm

Post by SmotPoker » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:35 pm

I'd vote yes, if it's open for voting :P

User avatar
Enzo1997
Lux Vacationer
Posts: 1628
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:44 am
Location: Childhood
Contact:

Post by Enzo1997 » Sat Oct 09, 2010 9:31 pm

possibly, but I would say 80 games.

hanzal69
Lux Newbie
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 5:58 am

Post by hanzal69 » Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:09 am

and still no LCS in the rank page...

User avatar
SmotPoker
Lux Addict
Posts: 1231
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 3:45 pm
Location: Pot farm

Post by SmotPoker » Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:10 am


User avatar
Enzo1997
Lux Vacationer
Posts: 1628
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:44 am
Location: Childhood
Contact:

Post by Enzo1997 » Sun Oct 10, 2010 11:01 am

LCS well to put it lightly tripped on it's way out of the starting gate.

User avatar
paranoiarodeo
Semiholy Tyrant
Posts: 10421
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 5:30 pm

Post by paranoiarodeo » Sun Oct 10, 2010 1:12 pm

Just as a footnote ...

In the future I believe points awarded for bots games need to be diminished somewhat ...

I'd rather see teams earn their place by besting one another ...

∞ paranoiarodeo shrugs ∞

User avatar
Darth Rellek
Sith Lord
Posts: 1392
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 8:56 pm
Contact:

Post by Darth Rellek » Sun Oct 10, 2010 2:19 pm

paranoiarodeo wrote:Just as a footnote ...

In the future I believe points awarded for bots games need to be diminished somewhat ...

I'd rather see teams earn their place by besting one another ...

∞ paranoiarodeo shrugs ∞

so those teams that played 30+ bot games got the same points as a fullhose????

That doesnt seem right.

User avatar
paranoiarodeo
Semiholy Tyrant
Posts: 10421
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 5:30 pm

Post by paranoiarodeo » Sun Oct 10, 2010 2:24 pm

Darth Rellek wrote:That doesnt seem right.
Didn't seem right last year or the year before that or ...

∞ paranoiarodeo should permanently retire as player and become Lux's official stats rankings and tourney guy ∞

calmdowndonk
Lux Newbie
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 10:36 am
Location: Sweden

Post by calmdowndonk » Sun Oct 10, 2010 2:33 pm

I thought this toruney was meant to be played against humans, team RW are playing the system, they play 3 vs 3 bots all the time.

does not look so fair :/

User avatar
Darth Rellek
Sith Lord
Posts: 1392
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 8:56 pm
Contact:

Post by Darth Rellek » Sun Oct 10, 2010 2:51 pm

omg, we, SED just play a 3 vs 3bots, and got 7 points for the win!!!

That just seems unfair to people that actually play.

so if we played 30 games with bots and won we'd get 210 points???

User avatar
Capicola
Gorgeous Man
Posts: 473
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:02 am
Location: Cleveland Heights

Post by Capicola » Sun Oct 10, 2010 2:55 pm

gooooooo darth!

User avatar
Enzo1997
Lux Vacationer
Posts: 1628
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:44 am
Location: Childhood
Contact:

Post by Enzo1997 » Sun Oct 10, 2010 3:44 pm

of course you say nothing when SED does the same 7 games in a row all bots

User avatar
Darth Rellek
Sith Lord
Posts: 1392
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 8:56 pm
Contact:

Post by Darth Rellek » Sun Oct 10, 2010 3:47 pm

Enzo1997 wrote:of course you say nothing when SED does the same 7 games in a row all bots
of course we are, we are trying to catch up with the rest of you that have played so many bot,
but now that we do it, its wrong?


and we are willing to play only humans, but people arent guesting in

one team told his own team members that they wouldnt guest in to play us3 vs 3 cause they didnt want to lose their winning %

User avatar
paranoiarodeo
Semiholy Tyrant
Posts: 10421
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 5:30 pm

Post by paranoiarodeo » Sun Oct 10, 2010 3:57 pm

Image

User avatar
Enokrad
Dark Spawn
Posts: 3367
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:16 am
Location: New York
Contact:

Post by Enokrad » Sun Oct 10, 2010 5:39 pm

Like last year, something should be done about the bot games.

2 vs 2 vs 2 is fine.
3 vs 3 bot games though should not count.

there is one team in particular that has made a killing with the bots.

User avatar
paranoiarodeo
Semiholy Tyrant
Posts: 10421
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 5:30 pm

Post by paranoiarodeo » Sun Oct 10, 2010 6:59 pm

Real time including individual stats too ...

http://lux.paranoiarodeo.com/teams.html

;)

User avatar
Enokrad
Dark Spawn
Posts: 3367
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:16 am
Location: New York
Contact:

Post by Enokrad » Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:19 pm

well my team and i have been using the same tactic and have jumped to second place.

only shows how flawed the 3 vs 3 bot games are

User avatar
Enzo1997
Lux Vacationer
Posts: 1628
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:44 am
Location: Childhood
Contact:

Post by Enzo1997 » Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:20 pm

Notice seductions 3.04? Maybe it's because of their 10 bot games, even after saying that bot games are wrong. Hmm... suspicious, hypocrytical, no couldn't be. :roll:

RW are .18 off the lead
10M are .19 off the lead
MFS are .22 off the lead
AND are .36 off the lead

We are all still in this so LET'S GO FTW!

User avatar
Enokrad
Dark Spawn
Posts: 3367
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:16 am
Location: New York
Contact:

Post by Enokrad » Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:54 pm

different maps would have been nice too.
nobody wants to play deux anymore.
Rome games just take up to long to finish

User avatar
Drifter
Semiholy Rambler
Posts: 6770
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: An undisclosed location... for reasons of security, and therefore... insecurity...
Contact:

Post by Drifter » Sun Oct 10, 2010 8:29 pm

So suggest a map everyone wants to play. Classic was up for a while...

User avatar
Behemoth
Lux Flyweight
Posts: 1403
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 2:09 pm

Post by Behemoth » Sun Oct 10, 2010 8:45 pm

Enokrad wrote:different maps would have been nice too.
nobody wants to play deux anymore.
Rome games just take up to long to finish
Few folks in Duex now.

On another topic. Be great if there was a way to get un-stuck from a team that doesn't attend. LCS was a non-event last year and non-existent this year :|

User avatar
Enzo1997
Lux Vacationer
Posts: 1628
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:44 am
Location: Childhood
Contact:

Post by Enzo1997 » Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:07 pm

Fine as long as we're changing rules to certain teams advantage let's make the minimum amount of games to 125. Okay? RW played so many games, we should get some type of advantage.

User avatar
Enzo1997
Lux Vacationer
Posts: 1628
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:44 am
Location: Childhood
Contact:

Post by Enzo1997 » Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:10 pm

Anyhow why do we even have robots if games against them don't count?

User avatar
Darth Rellek
Sith Lord
Posts: 1392
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 8:56 pm
Contact:

Post by Darth Rellek » Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:01 pm

yes, you are correct, I did complain about the scoring, and was told that this is the way it has been for the past two years, and that I shouldn't complain.
So I decided to roll with it and try to take advantage of it, as other teams were doing,
And now people want to complain about that.

I dont see how anyone can play over 50% of the tourney under one scoring, then think it should be changed to another scoring half way through.

Play, have fun.

User avatar
Enzo1997
Lux Vacationer
Posts: 1628
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:44 am
Location: Childhood
Contact:

Post by Enzo1997 » Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:07 pm

When is this tourney ending?
12:00 EST?

User avatar
paranoiarodeo
Semiholy Tyrant
Posts: 10421
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 5:30 pm

Post by paranoiarodeo » Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:08 pm

Darth Rellek wrote: I did complain about the scoring, and was told that this is the way it has been for the past two years, and that I shouldn't complain.
Perhaps you were told wrong ... ?

dustin's mid-tourney rule change in 2009 ... !

;)

User avatar
Enokrad
Dark Spawn
Posts: 3367
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:16 am
Location: New York
Contact:

Post by Enokrad » Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:12 pm

With the current system my team is in first place.

even so i support not counting the 3 vs 3 bot games even if though it brings my team to 3rd place.

How is this changing the rules to my teams advantage?????

User avatar
Drifter
Semiholy Rambler
Posts: 6770
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: An undisclosed location... for reasons of security, and therefore... insecurity...
Contact:

Post by Drifter » Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:15 pm

Be glad the 100 game minimum rule change did not take place...

Post Reply