Page 2 of 3
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 1:24 pm
They are not at fault for gaming the system.
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 2:55 pm
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 3:15 pm
Can we get something besides Rome up for a bit..... like Classic again... or maybe deux?
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 3:24 pm
I have yet to see Cube Wars so far in the Team Play Tourney. Its actually a really good map for teams. Please, can we try it for a few?
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 3:36 pm
dustin wrote:I've tweaked the team assigner to hopefully give more new players to teams that don't have many.
But I think the real problem is that we have too many different teams. This also makes it tough to have multiple rooms open at once.
So... the 1 or 2 bottom human team at the end of this tournament is going to get disbanded! Their members spread on the wind of other teams. Fight for your life teams!!!
Instead of disbanding the losing teams why not add more teams and open another host for us to battle on? As it is I had a very hard time playing yesterday since the 10M's weren't online at the same time where as the other teams MFS, SED, & AND had plenty of team members on hand to play games. There are 7 teams in total; 6 if you discount the robot team. Why not add 2 more New teams and open a new host? the room was overflowing with players all night and day as high as 28 people at one time...
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 4:12 pm
agreed on that.....crazy. we won a load of games yesterday against bots when we had 3 in room. these have not counted. a bit unfair me thinks. where is the level playing field.
still been fun tho to play. GL to LCS for the rest of the day. sorry i'm not around to help.
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 4:15 pm
with rottenboy's point that is
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 5:27 pm
I have removed all 3v3 games from the team rankings results. I don't think it's fair to mix 3v3 games in with the majority of 2v2v2 games. Let me know if I missed any.
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 6:21 pm
what is RW
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 6:30 pm
RW = Raw Whores, a Team, very inactive and may not hit 50 games.
Anyway, I think lessening the teams is a great idea.
Naraku -- The RAW whores can't even play. Poor BWE and Mnemosyne are left out, along with others. Another room wouldn't help any besides those with tons of players! The extra room was needed when the room was near 30 players (26/29 was highest I saw)
We need the weakest team to be disbanded, such inactive participation is hurting other teams. MFS has a TON of players -- They're always in, always racking up points. At most I've seen 5 AND members together at once, for only a short period of time. MFS and SED want more rooms b/c there are so many, which is okay, but if it isn't leveled out it isn't too cool.
And Glad to know 3v3 = Gone
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 6:38 pm
Yet LCS leads
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 6:39 pm
Shockandawe wrote:Yet LCS leads
Not by average ... look again ...
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 6:50 pm
Moiz wrote:We need the weakest team to be disbanded...
Weak? If pulling down two 1st place finishes and one 3rd in three years makes a team weak, then okay. I have not had time to play all weekend, and the rest of the returning members are AFK as well. Kinda harsh to just throw it all away.
Maybe it's time to put all the existing teams on the shelf considering almost all the founding members are not around anymore, and start fresh with all new teams, in some form or fashion.
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 6:55 pm
starting new teams would be a good idea but... wouldn't this just be the same problem again next year just with new names... I think there should be new teams every year. sorta like they do with survivor. sign up 6 teams with 6 members then just add more as they join.
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 6:56 pm
dustin wrote:I have removed all 3v3 games from the team rankings results. I don't think it's fair to mix 3v3 games in with the majority of 2v2v2 games. Let me know if I missed any.
very honorable. thanks a lot.
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:16 pm
Moiz wrote:We need the weakest team to be disbanded...
Nah Drifter -- I mean it like... The Weakest time like the one without participation, which obviously makes them Weak because they can't get to 50 Games -- Robots were beating RW for a while :p
Maybe its b/c of no time, but the inactive participation clearly means there's at least one too much team. RW members have barely played and sometimes because of imbalanced teams its MFS VS SED VS LCS, always.
They've got more active members, I understand you didn't have time to play but if your entire team doesn't have time to play enough to get anywhere in the rankings its better to have them in a spot that another team can benefit -- along with those wanting to play on the smaller team.
New teams would be nice, too. Even though it sounded cool to be an AND member forever. I like my team even if we have our suck-moments
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:21 pm
To tell you the truth, I came in to try and get in a few games but every time I was around the RW's got shuffled out so I figured I'd take my shuffle luck elsewhere and hope other could get in.
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:22 pm
Packman wrote:To tell you the truth, I came in to try and get in a few games but every time I was around the RW's got shuffled out so I figured I'd take my shuffle luck elsewhere and hope other could get in.
The chances are less. You three RW's are against like 8 MFS, Lol.
We need a new room at least.
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:34 pm
Moiz, I love how you come into this in it's fourth year and have all the answers.
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:45 pm
Just giving my opinion. You don't think it sucks that some of the people can't play?
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 3:00 am
Congrats on first Team Seduction! Well done.
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 3:12 am
The Winner of the Teams Tournament is <a href="http://sillysoft.net/lux/rankings/team/ ... duction</a> !!!
<i>We saw, we conquered, we came</i>
Second Place goes to <a href="http://sillysoft.net/lux/rankings/team/ ... caLux">Ten Monkeys of the ApocaLux</a> !!
<i>Oh, yes, poo WILL be flung.</i>
Third place goes to <a href="http://sillysoft.net/lux/rankings/team/ ... lipped">My Finger Slipped</a> !
<i>Carpe puga !</i>
Full results are here:
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 3:14 am
thanks everyone for a great time.
Lets do this again soon.
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 4:23 am
rottenboy wrote:Changing the game to 3v3 at the last minute and allowing team SED to play 10 games with bots winning 7 of them of course is ridiculous. But then again i guess the only way they can win is against bots.
Looks like SED could win against humans
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:23 am
Julius Caesar proclaimed: Veni, Vidi, Vici (I came, I saw, I conquered). He didn't see first, then conquered, then came. You can't see or conquer something without first coming there. Not unless you are from Star Trek and have time traveled. If so, then that's not fair either and maybe Dustin should delete all your wins.
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:31 am
Somebody give that poor ESL kid a link!
There ya go! (it's slang)
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:38 am
went right over his head
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:50 am
Le petit mort ... !
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 11:22 am
Sorry, but my mind is pure and I cannot be blamed for not thinking like a pervert.
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 11:29 am
LOL Claudiu, that did make me chuckle. I thought the team name 'Sedction' would have been a hint