Here's the Classic Tourney LIVE LEADERBOARD.
Here's the shiny bling that will be awarded to the classic winners:



If you dont like the tournament rules, maybe you could propose a change.RogueMonk wrote:Sitting on three games is hardly winning.
Huh? I love the tournament rules. How else would I win anything?imapickle wrote:If you dont like the tournament rules, maybe you could propose a change.
Say a 3-human game is worth 0.6 points. Then if a player won 5 3-human games they would have a perfect score and a player placing 1,1,2 in 6-human games would lose to them. I agree bot games shouldn't hurt you, but the best solution is to only count fh games, however we are not capable of that with our current player base.imapickle wrote:Games with less than 6 human players scored less points, but still counted as 1 whole game for the purpose of taking averages. I would suggest maybe it should count as a fraction of a game so if it is worth 0.8 of the points it counts as 0.8 of a game.